![]() While outlining the challenges to any theory, the final suggestion of the paper is that with inspiration of Simmons' theory and introducing a relation between the generalities (universal Whatness), create a modification in Aristotelian theory to overcome the challenge of the irreductive challenge of Species (kinds) Simons' theory, in some sense, collapses back to Aristotelian Theory. As nouns the difference between generalities and particular is that generalities is while particular is a small individual part of something larger a detail, a point. Simmons's theory also returns to Aristotelian theory. Aristotelian theory does not seem to be very successful in showing that the spices (kinds) are unchangeable or at least does not explain it. In spite of the superiority of these two theories over the other theories, each has problems need to be addressed. Both Peter Simons' Nuclear Theory and Aristotelian Substance Theory may present an acceptable explanation for the following three problems: Identity of Indiscernible, Excessive Necessitism and Change. Level of learning can be classified as memorization, understanding, or application.The ontological analysis of concrete particulars deals with the relationship between concrete object and their attributes. For particulars, as everyone knows, make for virtue and happiness generalities are intellectually necessary evils.Concepts and facts represent knowledge of things, and principles and procedures represent knowledge of changes. Content (what is learned) can be classified in accordance with the type of knowledge.It is helpful to distinguish between what content is learned and on what level it is learned: Generalities of changes are what we usually call statements of principles and procedures. transitive verb To speak in generalities to talk in abstract terms. Particulars of changes are instances of procedures and principles, and include specific events, like the evaporation of a puddle on my driveway last Sunday, the growing of a particular flower from a seed in front of my neighbor's house, and my son's writing of an essay last Tuesday night. or a general principle) from particulars. Generalities of things are what we usually call definitions of concepts.Ĭhanges. For particulars, as everyone knows, make for virtue and happiness. Particulars of things are instances of concepts, and include objects (e.g., one particular computer), actions (e.g., one particular debate), ideas (e.g., one particular thought), and symbols (e.g., one particular fraction). 6 quotes have been tagged as generalities: Alfred North Whitehead: We think in. Generalities are statements which apply to more than one particular. ![]() ![]() Moral generalists think morality is best understood in terms of moral principles moral particularists deny this. Particulars are single, unique cases, often referred to as referents, examples or instances. philosophical grips with morality is what role, if any, moral principles have to play.Knowledge of changes in things (productive knowledge).Įach of these kinds of knowledge can occur in either of two forms (see Figure 1):.Generality noun The greater portion or number the majority. ADVERTISEMENT Particular adjective Attentive to or concerned with details or niceties, often excessively so fussy. Generality noun An imprecise or vague statement or idea. Knowledge of things (descriptive knowledge) and Particular adjective Of, relating to, or providing details precise gave a particular description of the incident.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |